Nassau County, New York

IT support for Garden City law firms

Garden City holds one of the largest concentrations of legal practice on Long Island, and a good share of it is multi-practice firms with real headcount. At that size the technology questions change: not whether email works, but whether three practice groups with different requirements can be served by one set of systems.

Talk to DP3

One firm, several practices, conflicting requirements

A firm running litigation alongside corporate, trusts and estates, and real estate is running four different technology profiles under one roof. Litigation generates enormous document volumes and lives on deadlines. Corporate work arrives with client security requirements attached. Trusts and estates holds records for decades. Real estate moves in bursts tied to closings.

The failure mode is averaging. A single policy that suits nobody in particular, usually set to whatever the most vocal group asked for, and then quietly worked around by everyone else. Workarounds are where the security problems come from: personal cloud storage because the sanctioned one is too slow, forwarding to personal email because the file is too large.

The alternative is segmentation that reflects how the practices actually differ, with retention, access and storage set per group rather than firm-wide. That takes a conversation with each group instead of one meeting with the managing partner.

What comes with size

Client security questionnaires

Corporate and institutional clients audit their outside counsel. We complete these accurately rather than favorably, because an overstated control is a representation your firm has made.

Lateral hires and departures

An attorney arriving brings matters and leaves with access that has to be closed cleanly. Both are the same problem: knowing exactly what a person could reach, which requires access to be documented before anyone needs the answer.

Working with internal IT

Firms at this size often have someone in-house already. Co-managed is a normal structure, not an exception, and it usually means they keep the relationships while we carry tooling and advisory.

How we work with firms here

We do not keep a storefront in Garden City. Our New York team works from home offices across the metro area and on site with clients, and most support is delivered remotely. Where a project genuinely calls for people in the building, that is planned with you rather than assumed.

What firms at this size usually want from a provider is not more tickets closed faster. It is someone who can sit in a partners' meeting and explain, without jargon and without selling anything, what a given decision will cost and what it will prevent. That is the vCIO half of the engagement and for a firm of this size it is generally the half that matters more.

Common questions

Can you complete our clients' security questionnaires?
Yes. We answer them accurately rather than favorably, because a questionnaire returned with an overstated control becomes a representation the firm has made to its client. A candid answer with a remediation date is the stronger position.
We have an internal IT person. Does DP3 replace them?
Not necessarily. Co-managed arrangements are contemplated directly in our Master Services Agreement. Typically the internal person keeps the relationships and daily work while we carry monitoring, security tooling, patching and advisory.
How disruptive is changing providers?
It depends on what is being changed and we would rather scope that honestly than quote a number here. What we can commit to is that disruptive work is scheduled around your deadlines and client commitments, which is set out in our code.

Start with a conversation

Thirty minutes on how the firm runs and where the technology is holding it back. No obligation either way.

Schedule a Consultation